Guest Guest
| Subject: LSD Question Sun Jan 30, 2011 11:25 am | |
| Am I right that the MK10 had a LSD , if so why was this deleted for the 420G ?
Thanks Alan S.S.O.C |
|
jag420g Resident Mk10\420G Guru
Posts : 445 Join date : 2010-01-19 Age : 66 Location : Melbourne, Australia
| Subject: Re: LSD Question Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:02 pm | |
| Alan, Why do you say this was deleted??? To my knowledge: The rear axle was a SALISBURY HYPOID LIMITED SLIP across the entire range, from the mark 10 3.8 litre to the 420G. Charles
Last edited by jag420g on Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:54 pm; edited 1 time in total | |
|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: LSD Question Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:20 pm | |
| - jag420g wrote:
- Alan,
Why do you say this was deleted??? To my knowledge: The rear axle was a SALISBURY HYPOID LIMITED SLIP across the entire range, from the mark 10 3.8 litre to the final 420G.
Charles Not to my knowlege Charles , only fitted to MK10 and then returned to a normal diff for the 420G . My car has the original diff and that's not a LSD . Asked this question on the JWM Forum , reply came it was not an optional extra , but what I would like to know is why ? Alan S.S.O.C |
|
jag420g Resident Mk10\420G Guru
Posts : 445 Join date : 2010-01-19 Age : 66 Location : Melbourne, Australia
| Subject: Re: LSD Question Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:28 pm | |
| Alan, yes I see where you are coming from: let me elaborate, What I wrote earlier holds true, but from chassis no. G1D 54476 RHD The limited slip "Powr lock Differential was deleted from the final drive unit of 420G cars in favour of a conventional differential. However I cannot shed any light as to the reason at this stage. Charles | |
|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: LSD Question Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:54 pm | |
| Charles , it's a strange one , why fit to only a few then revert to conventional ? if a change was to be made surly the time would have been right at the introduction of the 420G .
I shall investigate further .
Alan S.S.O.C |
|
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: LSD Question | |
| |
|